All those years ago when my son was statemented for his Dyslexia I went gone along with the diagnosis. I was young, ignorant and taught by my parents to respect authority.

It was over 8 years ago when I attended a course as a learning support assistant for the same school that I realized my mistakes.
I already knew that the children I had supported for many years all had similar degrees of difficulties (or under the same umbrella.

They had varying degrees of high motor activity, slow at processing (not following instructions) gross/fine motor skills, balance, co-ordination, organisational skills, direction, judgement of distance, left and right laterality, learning/behaviour difficulties and tracking.

Over the years I noticed children who had similar symtoms being investgated for ADHD, Autism/Aspergers, Dyslexia, behaviour and learning difficulties. Working with over 130 children in 8 years I saw that many of the root causes was motor skills difficulties. Failure in school inevitably resulted in the lowest self esteem children should ever have to experience.

I had been on many courses over the years and this week the course was about Dyspraxia and how to screen children.
Over the years of supporting children with special needs my understanding of Dyspraxia was that it was a medical issue. If a child had co-ordination difficulties they were taken to the Doctors and then referred to an occupational therapist, that is what the experts in books tell you but in real life your left on  your own. They would then (every week) be given some sort of occupational therapy (again very rarely in real life there is no funding)  I later found out from a leading OT that dyspraxia was the lowest of funding and that you very rarley got any support, but a booklet and a list of medical books which gave you strategies to support dyspraxia difficulties. Dyspraxia never affected you educationally. I stupidly thought a child would struggle in PE because they were clumbsy.

I listened as the tutor spoke about children’s symptoms and difficulties and realized that he was describing most of the children I supported every day. The most alarming realization was that I could see my son amongst them all. He had struggled for years at not being able to write, but could read and spell at the expected level but experts would give them labels of Dyslexia.

The Programme

Luckily our School fully supported me to start a programme of exercises as recommended on the course. The first  children were screened, chosen, parents informed and permission given to take part.

Children’s difficulties varied in severity but I chose some really nice exercises that looked good in the books, but had very little effect and this is where the problem started. No one tells you in books how to inform Parents, where to do the exercises, what resources you need, how long, what to look for and how long it takes to achieve a miracle parents are expecting.

The screening process we were shown was taken from the Maddeline Portwood book “Developmental Dyspraxia” and this is what I use today. The most useful screening I use now by observing children in Nursey. The main difficulty is processing ( or following instructions) and the inability to interact. I know that Dyspraxia is known to be linked with “the clumbsy child” but in Nursery a child who is slow to process stands out more. I went to a speech and language unit and we observed how children ( if had been at an ordinary school) would have been thought to have ADHD and referred to an Educational Psychologist. I know because in the past I have seen unqualified staff who have read snippets of information about difficulties and put children in this catogory. These children were actually “flitting”. These children had never been to nursey or experienced so much stimuli. They where like a chocoholic in a chocolate shop. They flitted from toy to toy and couldn’t decide what to play with first. We make allowances for imature motor skills and keep observing untill reception. I realised that at this age their motor skills are underdeveloped and if they are supposed to learn they can’t and this is when the problem starts. Their peers move on and they continue to fall behind and learning and especially behaviour problems become imbedded.  In reception at an early intervention stage children start the programme. At this time motor skills are developed at the same time as learning begins and everything works.   The exercises I use are all based on dealing with all the difficulties at the same time, this way children progress and encourage each other, self esteem builds and weaknesses are highlighted.

I was told in one school how a head (who was apparently an expert on Dyspraxia and a SENCO) had advised a child  to bounce a ball and measure each day how  much faster they could achieve this. UGHHH! what is this for, It may look at hand eye co-ordination but childrens motor skills need to be strenghthened.

We start jumping feet together, hopping on the left and right foot. We walk along lines and in and out of hoops for balance, left and right laterality, direction and listening. We use skate boards and skipping ropes and for tracking difficulties we use bean bags. The parts of the body that are weak are strengthened from the upper/lower body to the arms, wrists and hands (for handwriting).

If you strengthen the co-ordination and balance the body this strengthens the nueral pathways in the brain. Messages have been going around the long way around unnessesary pathways so you have to retrain them. This is seen as being clumsy (when you move one part of the body the whole lot moves) the same with the brain in that messages of information went the long way around (slow to process). 

I noticed that all the children who had learning /behaviour difficulties all had motor skills difficulties (MSD)   

When the children did the exercises you noticed how one side was much weaker than expected in most children.  You have 2 sides of the brain, one side sees things (CVC letters) individually and works with the other side to make them into a whole. We noticed in children who hadn’t been on the programme they were unable to progress and move on to make whole big words, blend and segment. They were also unable to leave spaces and wrote in snakes. we asked them to do a before and after piece of writing. Once their bodies were balanced, strengthened and co-ordinated this stopped. To an untrained eye this could be investigated/diagnosed in later years as dyslexia.

Children who who were again thought to have traits of Autism/aspergers were put on the programme. They were slow to process and interact with peers. They seemed to be obsessive but that was because they had learnt to use the same information as it was safe. New experiences, new information to learn, they wanted routine. We had one child who punched other children and was labelled Autistic. He was screened and found to have severe MSD. He was slow to process so could not react quickly, so he punched(I have video footage of this) following the programme he doesn’t do this anymore, is no longer thought to have any Autism. I work with him today as he struggles in maths. He is a naughty,if not a scheming little 9 year old.   As I had supported children for Autism for years at time I was an expert on the difficulties I know that MSD was the root cause.

As a child with MSD has a constantly unbalanced body they are not able to learn the basic visual steps needed. You need to keep still, fixate a moving object, take in the information and process this. School nurses test for focus and all the children had passed this simple test. Why was every child who went on the programme unable to track a beanbag from left to right(one of the exerises) I have introduced.

One child who was 7 years old came from another school who had diagnosed him as having dyslexia. He was screened and found to have severe weaknesses in huis motors. In one year he overcame this but still he struggled with his tracking. He was taken to a local optometrist who found he had tiny pheriferal vision. This is why he wasn’rt able to progress as he was unable to take in information in all aspects of life and learning. This would never have been highlighted if he hadn’t accessed the programme. He was at reception level learning and 2 years later achieved one point off a level 4 in maths, He still struggle in phonics but this is because  of years of MSD holding him back. His handwriting is spectacular and he writes joined up and better than an adult. In 130 children we have another little boy this year and he is 5 years old and having the programme and light therapy. We have got him in time.

I have a two 5 year old boys who were thought to have ADHD. They had been re-strained daily and had been given the allowance of being observed to see if they were flitting and were just late developers, but nothing worked. As their bodies were unbalnced they moved constantly. They both had severe motor skills difficulties and after being on the programme for 1 year are learning, calm and a credit to a class with no has high motor activity. And NO! they would not have grown out of it as I know I am the one who used to support (chair chuckers) in the past.

I have had 3 children who were being treated for bedwetting. They all had MSD. When they needed to go it took to long to process the information and it was to late. Once nueral pathways were strengthened processing increased and this problem stopped.

I have had several children who were under a speech therapist and had never been screened but all had MSD. Two especially(brothers) had severe MSD and were eventually refered to an occupational therapist. Our OT left it to me (as she totally supports my work) They were again at reception level but after a year their speech was at last making sense and was articulate enough to understand and they started interacting with peers. Without the programme they would have continued  to climb the special needs register. and struggled for years.

Because we deal with MSD early we no longer have special needs difficulties as they are dealt with. We only have them because they come from other schools who dont have a programme. 

Our screening and programme is free. We may not have high tech equipment (hoops, bean bags, masking tape and skateboards) but it is effective and works. Children laugh at me, at themselves or just because they are happy and they are with other children who are just the same. They may not have reams of printed out evidence that they can file and save. They will be given a certificate in the hall (not to humiliate them) when they burst with pride at applause from the whole class at their achievements. Even just having the skills to catch a ball in PE was enough to start with.

As a parent I struggled and worried that I had to find extra money to pay for the basic milk money, dinners, trips, photos, parties, presents and the list goes on. I have been there when parents have been informed that their child is having difficulties and witnessed the emotion. Weeks, months and years later children have progressed and the emotion has changed to happiness without the financial burden. Like smiling our programme costs nothing.

You could take a group of children and give half the exercises to one and the other half none. The only way this would work would be in a clinical environment. There personality inherited from parents determines how they will deal with life.

We know that every child is an individual with different experiences and they have different inputs from school and home. I could not sit back and do nothing for the ones with out the exercises just to prove a point. I only have my gut feeling and what have I been able to witness over the years in our school to know that we have made a difference too over 120 children.

Through experience of working in school I know that over many years’ children have been slow or failed to progress and their school has exhausted every resource possible. Following the exercise programme children were “Kick started” and everything works together. Older children from other schools who never never had access to a programme started to progress, but only with the combination of good teaching as a follow up, but they had to be taken right back to reception level to put back lost years.

The programme continues for as long as children need it and as every child’s difficulties vary in severity some older children have been on for as long as 2 years. For some children you saw a difference in 6 weeks. Through experience over the years I know that this is not enough and these children inevitably were put back on the programme as difficulties reapeared.

Our programme has been fully supported by our occupational therapist as we are giving children support that they unfortunately haven’t the funding or the time to support. They recommend staff from other schools to see what we are doing and have achieved.

It is important to know how the education system works and how a child has sometimes has difficulty in reaching its full potential. Schools and Parents I know do everything in their power to support children. Through no fault of their own (because life is never planned out as we would all like it) through protocol they can be swept along for months and years.

NURSERY
3-4 years old
Imagine a child who has just started school, already a year or two behind in their development. Maybe their speech and language, motor skills, hearing and visual (the four modalities) are delayed by almost 2 years. They may only have one year in Nursery and some children may have never accessed a Nursery setting before. For these children just social interaction with other children is a new experience. The emotion of leaving parents and processing new information is distressing. When assessed they are reaching targets no higher than a 3 year old. The National curriculum begins to observe them and take notes.

Assessment in Nursery
(Clumsy, poor concentration, high motor activity or limited movement, not following instructions, poor toileting, emotional, limited social interaction.)

Reception
4 - 5 years old
Children are expected to conform to the routine of a classroom. They are expected to follow rules and learn. They may have one or all of the above difficulties and are expected when assessed to progress with targets like all the other children in the class. Through continued assessment the class teacher will notice that a child is not achieving the set targets but puts it down to immaturity. The class teacher (if you are unlucky) may be a newly qualified teacher or may not have the experience and knowledge to notice a problem. Many people will disagree but I have seen and heard many teachers and support staff who know very little about Special needs children. I know because I was one of them.

This year, I now realise is the most important in school life as this is where any child’s difficulties should be picked up, monitored and dealt with. In our reception year this is were we start with phonemic awareness. At this stage a child needs to learn the sounds of the alphabet, blending, rhyming and segmenting. Most Nurseries will have given opportunities throughout the day for children to access and explore letters and numbers.

Children need phonemic awareness at this early stage, but phonemic awareness is not phonics, it is auditory and does not involve words in print.

The ability to hear and manipulate the sounds in a spoken word and syllables are made up of sequences of speech sounds (Yopp, 1992) It is essential for children learning to read in an alphabetic writing system and letters represent sounds or phonemes. Without phonemic awareness phonics mean little sense.

Imagine a child blending sounds to make a word and connecting sounds with their written symbols.

“The best predictor of reading difficulty in kindergarten or first grade is the inability to segment words and syllables into constituent sound units (phonemic awareness)” (Lyon, 1995)

Assessment in Reception
(clumsy, poor concentration, high motor activity or limited movement, not following instructions, poor toileting, unsettled in school, truancy, continued attempted avoidance of PE, emotional, limited social interaction)

Year 1 – School Action
5-6 years old
Children are expected to conform to classroom routines. They are expected to follow rules and learn. As they have difficulty processing (following instructions) at the required rate they are can be thought to be disruptive. They may start using avoidance strategies when expected to work. Other children soon learn to avoid them to stay out of trouble. Low self esteem starts to show.

Assessment in year 1
(clumsy, poor concentration, high motor activity or limited movement, not following instructions, poor toileting, eating problems, social problems, unsettled in school, truancy, avoidance of PE, difficulty progressing in Literacy and Numeracy).
At this point the school recognises that the child has a problem and is put on the special needs register.

Year 2
6-7 years old

Assessment in year 2
(clumsy, poor concentration, high motor activity or limited movement, not following instructions, poor toileting, eating problems, social problems, unsettled in school, truancy, avoidance of PE, difficulty in accessing the national curriculum as assessed to be almost 2 years behind their cognitive age, Discussions with Parents (3 weeks) health visitor, hearing tests, eyes tested social worker, speech and language. All the information is collated and reports sent to the school which could take months.

A meeting with the child’s Parents, SENCO, class teacher and support assistant is arranged.

The advice is to move the child up to up to School Action Plus and be assessed by Educational Psychologist. An Individual Educational Plan is drawn up to aim for small targets the child can achieve. The child will be put into a small group with support but will have no funding for this as it will be general support. Again a meeting is arranged with all the relevant agencies but this depends on whether staff required are ill, on holiday or are fully booked for months because they are the only ones available in 21 schools in your area. They could send a report but have no administration at the moment.

Year 3
7 - 8 years old

Assessment in Year 3
(clumsy, poor concentration, high motor activity or limited movement, not following instructions, poor toileting, eating problems, social problems, unsettled in school, truancy, avoidance of PE, difficulty in accessing the national curriculum as assessed to be almost 3 years behind their cognitive age, Discussion with Parents and outside agency, advise from Speech and Language, health visitor, General Practitioner, occupational therapists, educational psychologist, Portex and “The Butterfly Project”( to support the Parents and child at home and school.

To apply for New Approaches funding for extra support.

And so it goes on as the child rises up the SEN register. Some Education Authorities may disagree at these comments and some parents may agree. I write as a parent. The school will do as much as possible to support every child but this all depends on funding and resources of staff. One other factor is how many other children in the same class have needs that require support.
A child with out difficulties progresses at the required pace every parent and teacher hopes. Children need to be able to move at a steady pace in school but the national curriculum was not developed for special needs children.

STOP! Luckily you can eliminate many of these years of struggling, frustration and failure.

The experts recommend that children should be screened no younger than 7 years old allowing for immaturities in motor skills. The truth is at this age it is too late and associated behaviours/learning difficulties are escalating and becoming embedded. Children will have already lost the chance to maximise their potential. Because of this they move steadily up the special needs register.

I was very lucky in that following the programme in the morning I was also supporting children in class and I was then able to see the difficulties in all areas, especially literacy.

These children are lucky in that they are attending a school which supports a programme that can make a difference and they will never have to struggle.

I wish that every school could screen and produce an exercise programme. How many more children will have to wait be investigated and diagnosed with Dyspraxia / Dyslexia (and other symtoms )by experts and allowed to struggle.

Children without MSD ask to join the programme because they can see how much fun we have and we are now a special club.
The most important difficulty of all was that over 120 children’s self esteem increased to superhuman strengths because they witnessed every day their own success and these children no longer struggled.

Staff have the ability to recognise symptoms themselves in class and together as a whole school we support these children with SEN.

They are now a statistic for achievement not failure.

I  use preventative methods to avoid children getting dyspraxia and other associated difficulties but we better not say

” cure” as that would be a miracle, even though and I see them everyday.